Mycobacterial protocol for cats
In the UK, the majority of mycobacterial infections in cats are caused by tuberculous mycobacteria. The initial large culture study showed ~35% of infections to be caused by Mycobacterium microti (~20%) or Mycobacterium bovis (~15%) (Gunn-Moore et al., 2011ab), with ~50% of cases failing to grow. However, further, as yet unpublished work using the more sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach found a similar proportion of cases caused by M. bovis, but a higher proportion caused by M. microti (~35%) (Gunn-Moore and O’Halloran, unpublished data). The most common non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are in the M. avium complex (MAC), and a wide range of NTM can infect cats.
It is important to consider the factors below before undertaking treatment:
- There is a potential zoonotic risk – the disease may be caused by a member of the tuberculosis (TB) complex. All members of the affected cat's household must be considered. It is important to determine any potentially immunosuppressed individuals (e.g. people with human immunodeficiency virus or who are undergoing chemotherapy). Treatment is not advised where such individuals may be exposed. Treatment is also not advised if the affected cat has generalized disease, cavitating lesions within the respiratory tract or extensive draining cutaneous lesions as these may increase the risk of transmission
- Treatment is almost always long term – this can be difficult to maintain given patient non-compliance, the inherent toxicity of some of the drugs and the financial costs involved. In some cases, the drugs may at best suppress disease and indefinite treatment may be required (Sieber-Ruckstuhl et al., 2007; Greene and Gunn-Moore, 2011). Uncomplicated cutaneous cases with or without diffuse pulmonary changes carry the most favourable prognosis. Placement of a feeding tube may be required to improve compliance
- Interim management – pending a definitive diagnosis, interim therapy with a fluoroquinolone is recommended in cases of localized cutaneous infection (Gunn-Moore et al., 2010). Pradofloxacin (or moxifloxacin) is recommended as it is more effective against mycobacteria than the older fluoroquinolones, such as marbofloxacin (Govendir et al., 2011). With more extensive disease, double or triple therapy is advised (Greene and Gunn-Moore, 2011); i.e., start with pradofloxacin and azithromycin, pending confirmation, then add rifampin when TB is confirmed.
Treatment of mycobacterial disease
Previously, anti-tuberculosis treatment was given in an initial and then a continuation phase (Greene and Gunn-Moore, 2011); however, it is now known that it is better to give all three drugs for 4–6 months, depending on the extent of disease, and always for at least 2 months following complete resolution of the lesions. In those cats where triple therapy is not feasible, treatment should still involve two drugs and should be given for a minimum of 6–9 months. Extensive clinical experience supports using rifampin, pradofloxacin and azithromycin as a starting point; however, NTM infections may need different combinations.
Drug | Uses | Dose (mg/kg) | Effects of toxicity |
---|---|---|---|
Pradofloxacina | First-line treatment for TB, NTM | 3–5 p.o. q24h | Reversible neutropenia, seizures in cats with CNS disease |
Rifampinb | First-line treatment for TB, MAC, NTM | 10–15 p.o. q24h |
Side effects in ~40% of cases, with severe side effects in ~5%. Poor palatability, nausea, discoloration of body fluids, generalized erythema and pruritus, hyperaesthesia, CNS signs, hepatotoxicity, anaphylaxis Teratogenic |
Clarithromycinc,d Azithromycinc |
First-line treatment for TB, MAC, FLS, NTM |
7–15 p.o. q12h 5–15 p.o. q24h |
Possible pinnal or generalized erythema, hepatotoxicity, possible GI signs |
Isoniazidb |
Second-line line treatment for TB Prophylaxis for TB |
10–20 p.o. q24h 10 p.o. q24h |
Hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuritis, seizures, acute renal failure |
Ethambutolb | Second-line treatment for TB | 10–25 p.o. q24h | Optic neuritis |
Pyrazinamideb,e | Second-line treatment for TB | 15–40 p.o. q24h | Hepatotoxicity, GI signs |
Dihydrostreptomycinb | Second-line treatment for TB | 15 i.m. q24h | Ototoxicity |
Clofazimineb,f | Treatment for FLS, NTM |
4–8 p.o. q24–48h Max. 25 total |
Hepatotoxicity, GI signs, discoloration of body fluids, photosensitization, pitting corneal lesions |
Doxycyclineg Amikacinb Cefoxitin |
Second-line treatment for NTM, MAC |
5–10 p.o. q12–24h 10–15 i.v., i.m., s.c. q24h 20–30 i.v., i.m., s.c. q6–8h |
GI signs, oesophagitis Nephrotoxic, ototoxic Pain on i.m., s.c. injection |
Potentially useful drugs for the treatment of feline mycobacterial disease. Second-line treatments for tuberculosis should be reserved for resistant infections. Ensure all aspects of cascade prescribing have been considered before using drugs only authorized for human use. Data from Kaufman et al., 1995; Gelatt et al., 2001; Bennett, 2007; Sieber-Ruckstuhl et al., 2007. FLS = feline leprosy syndrome; MAC =M. avium-intracellulare complex; NTM = non-tuberculous mycobacteria; TB = tuberculosis.aThe authors do not recommend enrofloxacin as it has been associated with retinal degeneration; other than the newer fluoroquinolones (pradofloxacin and moxifloxacin), most others are not effective against MAC infections.b These drugs may cause potentially serious side effects (e.g. hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity); it is advisable to monitor use closely, including routine haematology and serum biochemistry 2 weeks after starting treatment and again following any change in the cat’s demeanour.c M. tuberculosis and some NTM, potentially including MAC infections, can have inducible resistance genes to macrolides, meaning they appear susceptible in vitro but are resistant in vivo; where possible (limited by GI signs), use higher doses to reduce the risk of resistance.d Particularly useful when treating MAC infections.e Not effective against M. bovis infection.f Can be difficult to obtain.g Give with food or give water after the medication to avoid oesophageal injury.
Treatment of NTM
At a minimum, use of a fluoroquinolone is suggested while waiting for PCR or culture results. The new fluoroquinolones (e.g. pradofloxacin or moxifloxacin) are recommended as they have an extended spectrum of activity, which includes some NTM, and they are even effective against MAC infections (Govendir et al., 2011).
MAC infections are particularly difficult to treat (Jordan et al., 1994). Clarithromycin should be included (Piersimoni et al., 1995), ideally in combination with rifampin (Tomioka et al., 2002) ± another antibiotic according to culture and susceptibility testing, such as doxycycline (Baral et al., 2006) or, from human studies, ethambutol (Esteban et al., 2012).
Pyogranulomatous panniculitis requires long-term antibiotics and radical well planned surgery: e.g., doxycycline for several weeks, then radical surgical excision and local reconstruction plus parenteral gentamicin perioperatively for 3–5 days, followed by a prolonged course (3–6 months) of a new fluoroquinolone (White et al., 1983; Malik et al., 1994, 2000, 2004). Non-surgical cases may require double or triple therapy.
Feline leprosy-type infections (feline leprosy syndrome; FLS) can usually be treated with surgical removal of small nodules, which may be curative. Where medical management is needed, clarithromycin, pradofloxacin and rifampin or clofazimine are recommended. Doxycycline, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides may also be useful (Mundell 1988; Malik et al., 2002, 2006a; Courtin et al., 2007; Malik et al., 2013). Dapsone is considered too toxic for use in cats (Hamanda et al., 1991) and is antagonistic to clofazimine. Treatment should be continued until the lesions have completely resolved, and ideally for a further 2–3 months to reduce the risk of recurrence; however, some cases require life-long clarithromycin to prevent recurrence (Malik et al., 2013).
Mycobacterial species | Susceptibility | Generally resistant |
---|---|---|
M. avium |
Clarithromycin, rifampin, doxycycline, ethambutol, pradofloxacin, clofazimine, amikacin Recommended: clarithromycin or azithromycin + rifampin + another drug |
Older fluoroquinolones, cefovecin Potentially inadvisable to give just a new fluoroquinolone + clarithromycin or azithromycin |
M. fortuitum |
Recommended: pradofloxacin + amikacin (100%), cefoxitin (94%), older fluoroquinolones (75%), clarithromycin (~75%), clofazimine, rifampin, gentamicin or doxycycline (29%a) |
Trimethoprim ± sulphonamide, cefovecin, clarithromycin |
M. smegmatis |
Fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, gentamicin, trimethoprim ± sulphonamide, clofazimine Recommended: pradofloxacin + doxycycline |
Clarithromycin, cefovecin |
M. chelonae-abscessus |
Amikacin (100%), cefoxitin (94%), ciprofloxacin (75%), clarithromycin (71% a), pradofloxacin, clofazimine Recommended: azithromycin or clarithromycin + another drug |
Many oral medications, including doxycycline + older fluoroquinolones Do not give pradofloxacin or moxifloxacin with azithromycin or clarithromycin |
M. xenopi | Fluoroquinolones, clarithromycin, rifampin, clofazimine | |
M. simiae | Rifampin, clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones, amikacin, clofazimine | |
M. thermoresistible | Rifampin, doxycycline, clarithromycin | |
M. terrae | Clarithromycin, azithromycin, ethambutol | |
M. genavense | Clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones, ethambutol |
Susceptibility and resistance of mycobacterial species to potential drugs for the treatment of NTM in cats. Data from Studdert and Hughes, 1992; Malik et al., 1994, 2000, 2004, 2006ab; Michaud, 1994; Kiehn et al., 1996; Foster et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2000; Jang and Hirsh, 2002; Tomioka et al., 2002; Dietrich et al., 2003; Govendir et al., 2011; Cho et al., 2012; van Ingen et al., 2012; Bennie et al., 2014.aOther studies have shown these drugs to be either more or less effective.
Managing side effects: Cats may suffer side effects while receiving treatment for mycobacterial infections, especially with rifampin. While side effects can be concerning to owners and veterinary professionals, this drug is essential for optimizing the outcome of treating cats with TB and is the only drug in the triple therapy approach with activity against non-replicating bacteria.
To help manage dermatological side effects such as pruritus, oedema and erythema, chlorphenamine is advised (2–4 mg/cat p.o. q8–12h). Focal pruritic lesions can also be managed with topical hydrocortisone aceponate spray.
Hepatotoxicity is another possible side effect of rifampin, which may manifest clinically as hyporexia, nausea or vomiting, or may be identified with increased enzymes on serum biochemistry.S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) (20 mg/kg p.o. q24h) is one hepatoprotectant agent that is widely used in cases of drug-induced liver toxicity, as well as in cases of liver disease.
An intriguing alternative agent is N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (600 mg/cat p.o. q12h); while pharmacological data are lacking for its use in cats, it is safe and well tolerated. NAC has an unpleasant taste and smell, so giving whole capsules is usually advised. Nausea and vomiting are potential side effects, and drooling occurs when the capsule content is mixed with too little food. Since NAC can cause bronchial spasm, it should be used with caution in animals with asthma. NAC helps to restore blood glutathione concentrations and thus antioxidant capacity. It has also been shown to reduce bacterial counts and the severity of lesions. Restoration of antioxidant capacity helps reduce the toxic side effects of anti-TB drugs such as rifampin and isoniazid, which are mediated by oxidant-driven damage to the liver. Short-term studies have also shown that NAC has some direct anti-mycobacterial activity and can reduce growth of bacteria both in vitro and in vivo.
References
Baral RM, Metcalfe SS, Krockenberger MB et al.(2006) Disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in young cats: overrepresentation of Abyssinian cats.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 8, 23–44
Bennett AD, Lalor S, Schwarz T and Gunn-Moore DA (2011) Radiographic findings in cats with mycobacterial infections.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13, 718–724
Bennie C, To J, Martin P and Govendir M (2015) In vitro interaction of some drug combinations to inhibit rapidly growing mycobacteria isolates from cats and dogs and these isolates' susceptibility to cefovecin and clofazimine.Australian Veterinary Journal 93, 40–45
Cho JH, Yu CH, Jin MK et al.(2012)Mycobacterium kansasii pericarditis in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report and comprehensive review of the literature.Transplant Infectious Disease 14, E50–E55
Courtin F, Huerre M, Fyfe J, Dumas P and Boschiroli ML (2007) A case of feline leprosy caused by Mycobacterium lepraemurium originating from the island of Kythira (Greece): diagnosis and treatment.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 9, 238–241
Dietrich U, Arnold P, Guscetti F, Pfyffer GE and Spiess B (2003) Ocular manifestation of disseminated Mycobacterium simiae infection in a cat.Journal of Small Animal Practice 44, 121–125
Esteban J, García-Pedrazuela M, Muñoz-Egea MC and Alcaide F (2012) Current treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteriosis: an update.Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 13, 967–986
Foster SF, Martin P, Davis W et al.(1999) Chronic pneumonia caused by Mycobacterium thermoresistibile in a cat.Journal of Small Animal Practice 40, 433–438
Gelatt KN, van der Woerdt A, Ketring KL et al.(2001) Enrofloxacin-associated retinal degeneration in cats.Veterinary Ophthalmology 4, 99–106
Govendir M, Norris JM, Hansen T et al.(2011) Susceptibility of rapidly growing mycobacteria and Nocardia isolates from cats and dogs to pradofloxacin.Veterinary Microbiology 153, 240–245
Greene CE and Gunn-Moore DA (2011) Mycobacterial Infections. In:Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 4th edn, ed. J Sykes and CE Greene, pp. 495–510. Saunders, Philadelphia
Gunn-Moore DA (2010) Mycobacterial infections in cats and dogs. In:Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 7th edn, ed SJ Ettinger and EC Feldman, pp. 875–881. Saunders, Philadelphia
Gunn-Moore DA, McFarland SE, Brewer JI et al.(2011a) Mycobacterial disease in cats in Great Britain: 1 bacterial species, geographical distribution and clinical presentation of 339 cases.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13, 934–944
Gunn-Moore DA, McFarland SE, Brewer JI et al.(2011b) Mycobacterial disease in cats in Great Britain: 2 histopathology, treatment and outcome of 339 cases.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13, 945–952
Hamada K, Hiyoshi T, Kobayashi S et al.(1991) Anticonvulsive effect of dapsone (4,4'-diaminodiphenyl sulfone) on amygdala-kindled seizures in rats and cats.Epilepsy Research 10, 93–102
Jang SS and Hirsh DC (2002) Rapidly growing members of the genus Mycobacterium affecting dogs and cats.Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 38, 217–220
Jordan HL, Cohn LA and Armstrong PJ (1994) Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in three Siamese cats.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 204, 90–93
Kaufman AC, Green CE, Rakich PM and Weigner DD (1995) Treatment of localized Mycobacterium avium complex infection with clofazimine and doxycycline in a cat.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 207, 457–459
Kiehn TE, Hoefer H, Bottger EC et al.(1996)Mycobacterium genavense infections in pet animals.Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34, 1840–1842
Malik R, Hughes MS, James G et al.(2002) Feline leprosy: two different clinical syndromes.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 4, 43–59
Malik R, Hughes MS, Martin P and Wigney D (2006a) Feline leprosy syndromes. In:Infectious Diseases of the Dog & Cat, 3rd edn, ed. CE Greene, pp. 477–480. Saunders, Philadelphia
Malik R, Hunt GB, Goldsmid SE et al.(1994) Diagnosis and treatment of pyogranulomatous panniculitis due to Mycobacterium smegmatis in cats.Journal of Small Animal Practice 35, 524–530
Malik R, Martin P, Wigney D and Foster S (2006b) Infections caused by rapidly growing mycobcateria. In:Infectious Diseases of the Dog & Cat, 3rd edn, ed. CE Greene, pp. 482–488. Saunders, Philadelphia
Malik R, Shaw SE, Griffin C et al.(2004) Infections of the subcutis and skin of dogs caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria.Journal of Small Animal Practice 45, 485–494
Malik R, Smits B, Reppas G et al.(2013) Ulcerated and nonulcerated nontuberculous cutaneous mycobacterial granulomas in cats and dogs.Veterinary Dermatology 24, 146–153
Malik R, Wigney DI, Dawson D et al.(2000) Infection of the subcutis and skin of cats with rapidly growing mycobacteria: a review of microbiological and clinical findings.Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 2, 35–48
Michaud AJ (1994) The use of clofazimine as treatment for Mycobacterium fortuitum in a cat.Feline Practice 22, 3
Mundell AC (1995) Mycobacterial skin diseases in small animals. In:Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy, XII, ed. J Bonagura, pp. 622–625. Saunders, Philadelphia
Piersimoni C, Tortoli E, Mascellino MT et al.(1995) Activity of seven antimicrobial agents, alone and in combination, against AIDS-associated isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 36, 497–502
Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS, Sessions JK, Sanchez S, Latimer KS and Greene CE (2007) Long-term cure of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in a cat.Veterinary Record 160, 131–132
Smith DS, Lindholm-Levy P, Huitt GA, Heifets LB and Cook JL (2000)Mycobacterium terrae: case reports, literature review, and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing.Clinical Infectious Disease 30, 444–453
Studdert VP and Hughes KL (1992) Treatment of opportunistic mycobacteria infections with enrofloxacin in cats.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 201, 1388–1390
Tomioka H, Sano C, Sato K and Shimizu T (2002) Antimicrobial activities of clarithromycin, gatifloxacin and sitafloxacin, in combination with various antimycobacterial drugs against extracellular and intramacrophage Mycobacterium avium complex.International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 19, 139–145
van Ingen J, Totten SE, Helstrom NK et al.(2012)In vitro synergy between clofazimine and amikacin in treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease.Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 56, 6324–6327
White SD, Ihrke PJ, Stannard AA et al.(1983) Cutaneous atypical mycobacteriosis in cats.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 182, 1218–1222